Who is Setting the Priorities?
March 4th, 2008We know who, but we do not know why!
The federal budget, announced this week, does little to help people most in need. John Hagens, Chairperson of the Sarnia-Lambton Social Service Network, was quoted in the Observer as saying he was disappointed that little funding was earmarked for social welfare, especially for people with disabilities.
“It’s the government’s role to support people most in need. They’re the only ones who can do it, that can use tax dollars to do it.”
Armine Yalnizyan, a senior economist with the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives, was quoted as saying:
“What kind of responsible leadership is this when you’re rewarding people who have a lot, and doing nothing for people who are really struggling to stay afloat in the best of economic times?”
Some social spending initiatives in the budget included:
• $135 million for First Nations for water, health and education improvements
• $110 million for new mental health projects
• $90 million to extend an unemployment program
• $60 million towards an income supplement program for low-income seniors
And $350 million for post secondary school students, but $0 for an elementary school for students in Attawapiskat – even though 3 previous Ministers of Indian Affairs said that they supported the need, and the construction. ![]()
Finance Minister Flaherty in defending his program is quoted as saying:
“Some would have us go down the path to higher spending, higher interest payments and higher taxes. That approach is misguided. Our government is taking the path that requires focus, prudence and discipline.”
But is it prudent or disciplined to deny these elementary school students the chance to realize their potential in our Canadian society? Or even the chance for an education that other students in Ontario take for granted?
Why? Mr. Flaherty, Why?